Between October 18–21, this website will move to a new web address (from health.gov to odphp.health.gov). During that time, some functions might not work as expected. We appreciate your patience and understanding as we’re working to make this transition as smooth as possible.

Increase the proportion of children and adolescents who play sports — PA‑12 Data Methodology and Measurement

About the National Data

Data

Baseline: 58.4 percent of children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years participated in a sports team or took sports lessons after school or on weekends in the past 12 months in 2016-17

Target: 63.3 percent

Numerator
Number of children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years who participated in sports teams or lessons during the past 12 months.
Denominator
Number of children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years.
Target-setting method
Percentage point improvement
Target-setting method details
Percentage point improvement from the baseline using Cohen's h effect size of 0.10.
1
Target-setting method justification
Trend data were not available for this objective. A percentage point improvement was calculated using Cohen's h effect size of 0.1. This method was used because it was a statistically significant improvement from the baseline and the Healthy People 2030 Workgroup Subject Matter Experts expected the data to move in the desired direction during the next decade.

Methodology

Questions used to obtain the national baseline data

(For additional information, please visit the data source page linked above.)

From the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health:

Numerator:
DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS, did this child participate in:
  1. A sports team or did he or she take sports lessons after school or on weekends?
    1. Yes
    2. No

Methodology notes

There were changes to the wording of this question. Due to changes in the survey's mode of data collection and sampling frame, as well as adjustments to item wording where necessary, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) alerts data users that it is not possible to compare estimates from the redesigned survey to those from previous iterations of the NSCH or NS-CSHCN or to conduct related trend analyses. The redesigned NSCH will support trend analyses beginning with data from 2016.


1. Effect size h=0.1 was chosen to correspond with 10% improvement from a baseline of 50%.